![]() Perhaps more surprising is that even with the RTX 2060 Super, the 2700X is still the performance limiting component as here the 3700X was 18% faster. This highlights the kind of step forward AMD made with the Zen 2 architecture. The 2700X isn't much faster with the 2080 Ti when using the low quality settings opposed to the ultra quality settings, we're looking at about a 13% improvement in average frame rate with no change to the 1% low.Īlso for reference, with the ultra quality settings the 3700X is 9% faster than the 2700X, but we're seeing a 21% increase in performance for the 3rd-gen Ryzen processor. ![]() #Ryzen 7 3700x benchmark 1080p#We'll be looking at the same suite of 9 games, all tested at 1080p and 1440p using low quality settings with both an RTX 2080 Ti and an RTX 2060 Super.įirst up we have Battlefield at 1080p using the low quality preset and already we face some interesting results. That's to say in our experience we've found AMD and Intel processors enjoy similar performance gains when tuning. We've also found gains of over 20% for Ryzen processors when adjusting memory timings. Also, in our original review we found that a 5.1 GHz overclock could boost gaming performance by as much as 12%, so keep that in mind. The 10600K is not power limited, as that's typically the out of the box experience. We also took the time to overhaul our CSGO testing using a method recommended by a number of very keen Counter-Strike gamers.įor testing we're looking at out of the box performance with XMP loaded using CL14 DDR4-3200 memory on both AMD and Intel processors. So we've gone back, tested and added the 2700X to the results in this benchmark comparison. This had us wondering how well the previous generation R7 2700X would stack up against the 3700X, and of course, the i5-10600K, under the same test conditions. Clearly, the 3rd-gen Ryzen processor was able to hold its own and even pulled ahead in a few instances. We had found the i5-10600K to be 6% faster on average than the R7 3700X when gaming, and that margin barely changed to 7% using low quality settings in games such as Rocket League, Fortnite and PUBG. That is, performance in esports style of games didn't differ greatly than when we tested modern AAA games using high and ultra graphics quality presets. The results were interesting, though for the most part the margins weren't overly different to what we had seen in our original CPU review. Recently we compared the Ryzen 7 3700X against the new Core i5-10600K in 9 competitive titles using low quality settings to see just how much faster the Intel processor is when letting the frame rate shoot well above what you'd need for 144Hz gaming. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |